On August 13, 2010, the Food and Drug Administration approved the application for a new “Emergency Contraceptive” drug, ulipristal acetate, under the label “ella

“Ella” is the first selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) available in the United States for the indication of “emergency contraception (EC).” This class of drug (SPRM) blocks progesterone which is necessary to maintain a pregnancy. It disables the uterine lining, compromising it’s ability to form a functional “secretory” endometrium—the lining which nourishes the fertilized, implanting new human baby. This effectively deprives the brand new human child of oxygen and nutrients, and the child dies. This is abortifacient action.

Ella is chemically a first cousin to Mifepristone (RU 486), the “medical abortion” drug that kills the baby by blocking placental function. Ella has the same action: they are both selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM). The generic name is Ulipristal.

Today’s approval, labeling “ella” as emergency contraception, is deceptive and dangerous to women and their newly conceived baby. Women deserve to know that “ella” can cause death of the embryo, and the FDA is deliberately misleading women by mislabeling “ella” only as contraception, and not as abortifacient.

Here is what the FDA approved drug literature says:

“How does “ella” work?

“Ella” is thought to work for emergency contraception primarily by stopping or delaying the release of an egg from the ovary. It is possible that ella may also work by preventing attachment (implantation) to the uterus. “ The latter is clearly abortifacient action.

Why does the FDA not consider this an abortifacient? Semantic smoke and mirrors. Current medical semantics says “pregnancy begins with implantation.” (To them, conception and implantation are defined as the same thing. A “pregnancy” is conceived.) ProLifers say the “human life begins with fertilization.” A human life is conceived. So their side says “this does not effect a ‘pregnancy,’ thus not abortifacient.” We say, “This results in death of a new human being, thus is abortifacient.” Watch out for the smoke and mirrors!

Don’t miss this important fact: Ella only delays ovulation if taken in the day or so before ovulation happens, i.e., before the luteal surge which stimulates release of the egg. After ovulation, if the egg is fertilized, “ella” works as a progesterone-blocking abortifacient. How often would you guess a woman takes this in just the right widow (a day or two before ovulation) to delay ovulation? Not often. Taken at other times, it has no effect on ovulation.

The egg must be fertilized on the day of ovulation. (After 1 day, it resists fertilization) And why does “ella” work for 5 days after ovulation? Because it is on about the 5th day after ovulation and fertilization that the new baby begins to implant—but can’t, because the uterine lining function is disabled by “ella” This is abortifacient action. And this is why “ella” can be used, as advertised, up to 5 days after intercourse.

The FDA literature hints at this (see quote above from ‘How does “ella” work?’), but the FDA does not use the “A” word. We find this very deceptive for the women considering using “ella” who would otherwise not even think of having an

abortion.

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE EFFECTIVENSS OF “EC”

The medical literature claims that Plan B is “up to 95% effective if used within 24 hours of unprotected intercourse, less so if used over the next couple days. The literature also claims that “ella” is “more effective” than Plan B, and effectiveness, although diminished, is still a reality if “ella” is taken 5 days after intercourse.

REALITY CHECK

Q: How many days a month is a woman able to become pregnant?

Fact: EC is 100% effective about 26 days each month!! This is because it is impossible to get pregnant about 26 days a month (see below). Many of the days when women take EC, it is not possible to get pregnant anyway. This fact makes the “effectiveness” statistics look really good,

Some notes on timing:

If the sperm is deposited 3 days before ovulation fertilization ordinarily won’t happen, as the sperm is usually “dead” or not effective by ovulation time (unless, obviously, further sexual contact occurs or ovulation is early).

If the sperm is deposited 24 hours after ovulation, fertilization won’t happen, as the egg is “dead,” (i.e., no longer receptive to sperm).

So the narrow window of 2 or 3 days before ovulation to 24 hours after ovulation is the “fertilization window”

Delaying ovulation with use of EC in the preovulatory 2 day window of time apparently works as a contraceptive method, by delaying ovulation several days. Otherwise, the antifertility action would be abortifacient.

AAPLOG note: Remember, EC is 100% effective 26 days each month. This makes the “effectiveness” stats look really good—much better than reality suggests. Also remember that the major studies on Plan B (you know, claims of 89% effective) show NO DECREASE IN UNINTENDED PREGNANCY, AND NO DECREASE IN ABORTION RATES, even when the EC was given free and given to the patient ahead of time to have on hand for emergency use. See http://www.aaplog.org/position-and-papers/emergency-contraception/

AAPLOG

Two Wayne State pro-life organizations, the Christian Medical Association and Metanoia Graduate Christian Union, have invited in Drs. Peter Singer, atheist philosopher from Princeton, and John Patrick, Christian medical ethicist from Ottawa and very well known pro-life advocate (he’s helped lead the Hippocratic Registry for doctors), to discuss The Value and Worth of Human Life in three interactions on Thursday, September 16th at Wayne State. Please see details below.

Would you consider joining one or more of these interactions, and pass along this invitation as well? Singer represents the extreme, perhaps logical, end of materialistic atheism’s understanding of humanity. Without hesitation he is advocating for the next step in abortion’s logic: infanticide outside the womb. Patrick is a thoughtful, informed responder to these assumptions and proposals.

A SERIES OF THREE DISCUSSIONS:

Discussion 1: The Origin of Human Worth: Do we need God to value humans?

Place: Hilberry A &B in Student Center (2nd Floor) @ 9 AM

Discussion 2: The Future of Human Worth: Life and Death Decisions in Medicine

Place: In Jaffar Lecture Auditorium in Scott Hall at School of Medicine at 12 Noon

Discussion 3: The Main Event-Human Worth at the Beginning: Embryos, Babies, and the Dignity of Human Life.

Place: In the Community Arts Auditorium at 5:30 PM

We urge you to try your best to get to these vital discussions.

Direct any questions to John Bayon at jbayonjr@yahoo.com

AAPLOG

This is a collection collection of unedited comments from your peers in answer to the question: “What do I do if my assignment includes time spent on an abortion service or Planned Parenthood clinic, or similar assignment?”

AAPLOG points out that you do have conscience rights–(they come from God)– and you do have conscience protection, which comes from U.S. law: The Church Amendment from the 1970’s and the Hoekstra-Coats Medical Training Nondiscrimination Act of 1995 (which declares that an entity that forced individuals or programs to participate in abortions would be discriminatory, and on that basis that entity would lose federal funding.) Don’t forfeit your conscience rights. (And if push comes to shove, the Alliance Defense Fund and other similar legal organizations would be glad to take your case.)

For practical advice, we feel much wisdom resides with those who have faced the situation. We asked for and received the following notes from prolife doctors and students.

Advice from your peers:

male

I was a med student and a GYN resident at the cities “Abortion hospital” including Saline, Intracardiac Potassium, etc…for no reason other than convenience. The Chair, vice chair, and many private abortionists hated me. They were unable to touch me however based on the grace of God.

The way I survived the harassment was to be very careful to do the following:

1. Have an honorable life stance. No room for controversy such as vulgarity, disrespect of women and patients, disrespect to professors (that is what they do to us thus they expect we will do the same to them…don’t do it)

2. Read…Study…Be smarter and medically better than your peers.

3. Work longer hours to be sure you know the patients and their issues and Differential diagnoses etc.

THEN you have their respect

Now you need to know the facts

4. Learn the facts. That is…The EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE that medical school so loves to hold as the standard of intelligent medical decision making. Excellent sources include: aaplog.org web site where peer reviewed journal articles give you great medical info to “share” with others…including the patients! AUL.org gives accurate info regarding the laws that govern…or don’t…the abortion industry. When people see that the abortion industry fights Informed Consent (the great standard for patient autonomy and “choice”), but actually give woefully inadequate information in their consent process, it opens some eyes (except for those who choose to be willfully blind).

I had great pleasure in reading and quoting from the writings of Planned Parenthoods research arm..The Guttmacher Institute..Back in the late 80′s they published their own study that showed that 30% of their own patients, after being aborted, stated that they came to pp to KEEP their pregnancies and felt THEY were coerced !!! This was great! Pro-choice? Whose choice when 30% are forced against their will to abort.

5. At that time…everyone was wearing prochoice pins etc…So, I wore the little feet pins !!! great to start conversation.

To be successful, remember, you are on the front lines of this war. Know your enemy. Know how to persuade those around you. Be courageous, trust God for the rest. (from the New York theater of war).

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

male

They would not consider a crisis pregnancy center a valid medical rotation, I would volunteer to go to a community health center, STD clinic, etc.

I agree with the Community Health Center or STD Clinic as an acceptable alternatives to present.

If the school insists that (the student) spend a day at Planned Parenthood, and they won’t allow an alternative, tell him to go. He can see for himself what an abortion mill looks like, and if he gets a chance, he can discretely suggest to a patient that she might want to consider a second opinion at a crisis pregnancy center, or at least request an ultrasound. He should ask to sit in on a counseling session and learn firsthand what is not covered and how few options are discussed. Send him our list (at www.aaplog.org, see “abortion complications”) of abortion complications so he can ask intelligent and probing questions of the staff, preferably in front of a patient.

When he gets home, he may want to scrub with Lava soap under very hot water for about 2 hours.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I would contact the dean of the medical school and request a meeting to voice my objection.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

I was a resident in a top 10 OB/GYN residency program. As an intern, I was asked to hold the U/S for one first trimester abortion and after that told them that I would not attend or perform abortions or go to abortion lectures. The harassment was brutal. I was discriminated against in assignments to surgical cases, in a deliberate attempt to restrict my surgical experience and ostracized by my fellow residents. Attendings gave me the cold shoulder. I was threatened by the chair but told him that he could fire me, but that I would not perform abortions or stop praying with patients.

The advice about being stronger academically is very good. I got extra surgical experience by moonlighting. An attending at a Catholic hospital took me under his wing as well. Ironically, in my chief year, four junior residents stood up to the department and said that they also would not perform abortions. All power is in Jesus’ hands, and He will not abandon you. I ALWAYS found that it was better to be bold and stand for truth rather than being silent and/or hiding, (it would be nice to say that I always did the right thing, but I didn’t.). God honors holy boldness but only forgives cowardice (Prov. 25:26, Matt. 5:13). He won’t honor obnoxious behavior that disgraces His name. Another key is to have a group of people praying for you. In that hospital, people in Radiology, Environmental Services, the OR and elsewhere were praying and supporting me. In the end, the fire I went through made me a stronger Christian.

Remember that God is on your side, and if you have to suffer for Him, it is well. Also remember that few chairs will openly try to fire you or damage your career, since they are afraid of legal challenges (important to remember, and to tell them if need be).

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

I am a medical student from a prestigious med school and I just finished my ob/gyn rotation as a med student. I did end up talking to the course director prior to the rotation, but before I met with him, I talked with other medical students who I knew had the rotation and had gone before me. I would recommend talking with students at your school who share your opinion and have had the rotation (your local CMDA or Catholic group would know those students) and what they did. I would recommend talking with the course director if others have said he or she is reasonable. But, when you talk to him/her don’t site faith or other reasons other than specific legal language of it is “against your conscience rights.” That is still the law (even if it’s not reinforced) and most schools don’t want to get entangled in a legal battle with students. Usually they will work with you. Asking for an alternative usually works as well because they want you to learn and be productive.

Another thing you can do is talk to other students about whether or not such experience is truly required in terms of a sign-in sheet. In my experience, even though a go to a great university, most extras don’t have a sign in sheet and they don’t know who is supposed to show up when or if anyone is coming. Often times I find myself arriving at rotations or extras and they didn’t know I was suppose to come and didn’t have any plans for me being there. So, for example my school had a “required” lecture on abortion, but there was no sign in sheet, so I just didn’t show and it didn’t make a difference, no one knew and no one cared. I just read the required chapter for the exam and was fine. In my opinion, you are spending a quarter of a million on your education and you are the consumer, so you should make the education the best for you. But, if you do go, I agree, work hard, know your facts, and be better (more cordial, better fund of knowledge, know the evidence based medicine, etc) than your med student peers. But, I would recommend requesting at the pp site to not observe the actual abortion procedure – your conscience and soul is more important than anything on this earth

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As a former abortion provider, now pro-lifer whose ministry has operated a charity full pre-natal clinic, I would add Federally Qualified Health Clinics. FQHC’s are normally conservative and in great need of physicians. Family Planning is standard care in most FQHC’s.

Some charity clinics offer family planning as well as pre-natal care. Check your area for non-profit clinics that may even offer a broader range of OB-GYN care than Planned Parenthood.

Please join me in praying that the Lord will open a door for these young physicians for life-affirming service in their rotation.

Carol Everet

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am a health care provider and have recently resigned from Planned Parenthood due to religious conflict. I suggest that if the student is forced to rotate there, he or she, can ask the preceptor to not work on the surgical or med ab services, instead work on the gyn, male services, or, if available at that branch, the prenatal service.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

Wow. Thankfully I did not have such an issue at Vanderbilt. My heart goes out to those students. I think a lot of it depends on how receptive their faculty is. If this is a regular event that they have students in the rotation complete, they might consider forming a petition to show that they are not alone in their pro-life stance. If the Planned Parenthood experience is a lecture/ clinic environment (in other words, no exposure to actual procedures), they could attend regardless, as this would be a good learning opportunity to hear some of the so called “facts” and “counseling” that patients receive there.

I just hope that even if they feel they feel they cannot speak out for fear of grades/ evaluations, that they realize that there are many pro-life individuals in medicine! They are not alone!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Male

Have him and his colleague hold the line and do an alternative. If the school refuses, then they will need to seek legal counsel. They must not be intimidated at this stage. They tried this with me and I held fast. They cannot require you, under the federal statutes (Church amendment, etc) to do anything against your conscience.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

1. They may have the students doing something entirely separate from the abortions.

When I was a student we rotated through a county “family planning” clinic where abortions were done, but on our family planning clinic day, we mainly wrote for birth control pills and checked BP’s. It was a place like Planned Parenthood, but we were not involved in any abortions there. And our role was pretty minimal as students, since we could not actually prescribe the birth control. I didn’t feel I was put in the position of compromising on any principles.

2. Find out IF there will be any involvement with abortions, ahead of time.

Once, on my 3rd year OB/GYN rotation, I was assigned for part of the time with a doc in private practice. He said, “I’m doing an abortion tomorrow, you can come and watch if you want.” He sounded like he was allowing it to be optional, and from what he said I would be watching. Not assisting. And he was in private practice, so usually the guys in private practice didn’t necessarily want students to do much more than watch. Still, I phoned my pastor and asked him about it. We both agreed that if I only watched, that would not be wrong, and I should pray for the woman, silently of course.

I did consider “what if he ends up wanting me to hold something or assist in some way,” and I was aware that things can come up suddenly in a surgical situation where people just say, “Here, hold this,” or “Do that,” so I had that in mind also… if I would have gone in to watch the abortion, I would have been very clear with the attending that I was not agreeable to assisting. But then she changed her mind, and that was the only abortion case.

So, if it is not entirely clear, find out in advance IF one will be in on abortions, and if one will be watching vs. assisting, because that makes a difference. If a student could be present ONLY to watch and not assist, then that would be quite an opportunity to learn, to see how the women are really treated etc. What are they told about the procedure etc. Might even be an opportunity to find out if state informed consent laws are being followed etc. if it is an informed consent state, etc. But good to find out what is expected, set boundaries and see if it looks workable.

3. At the family planning clinic, we did do STD screenings and pelvic exams, and that was really our main reason for being there, I think, to just get practice doing the pelvic exams. If it was just that, I personally would have no problem just doing the pelvic exams even if it is Planned Parenthood, and I could do a rotation there. However, if that is a problem, there ought to be some community STD clinic or an STD clinic at the Medical School that would be an acceptable alternative. The pro-life pregnancy center would not be comparable because many aren’t medical, and even if medical such as providing ultrasound, you don’t get the experience in doing pelvic exams and treating STD’s.

4. Be informed. In addition to the AAPLOG website, go also to www.standapart.org and look at some of the research there on women’s mental health in relation to abortion. Possibly there will be some moment when you have an opportunity to educate another student, a resident, or even an attending, or perhaps there will be an opportunity to offer assistance to someone who does not really want an abortion.

I have one other suggestion but I have to look up the link, so will follow up further later.

Once I was involved in an abortion case while on a psychiatry rotation during residency. Because it was a second or third trimester, and too late to do at our medical center, the lady was going to go out of state to have the abortion. I was supposed to be involved in certifying “medical necessity” for a late abortion. Had it gotten to that point, I would have made someone else take over the case, but initially, I was just doing a pscyh evaluation, getting the information, and it had not reached a point where someone was going to expect me to sign something for her to have an abortion. Because it was so late, the states involved had a couple of standards, but just a couple signatures on a paper, and the abortion moves forward.

Anyway, while she was in psychiatry, when the right opportunity presented itself, I offered her the opportunity to view the ultrasound of her baby, which nobody else would have done, and later in the process she and her husband decided they were going to proceed with the pregnancy and not have the abortion. She changed her mind. I think probably seeing the print of the ultrasound probably made the difference.

There may be opportunities to make a difference even for some of the abortion patients, but one would want to be certain that one was not going to be in a position of potentially being forced into contributing to the actual abortion process.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF10B09.pdf

As an additional suggestion, I would suggest that residents take a look at this brochure– not sure if this is at the AAPLOG website or not– and become familiar with the info as well as following the links that are given. Might possibly give some ideas for discussion with patients or preceptors.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female (I think, from email address)

I am from Winston-Salem, NC. You should be able to determine the School of Medicine in that city. I was taking a course of study at the school shortly after I moved to W-S. I recall hearing an OBG faculty member say to another, “No resident is going to do a residency here without have done abortions.” The statement shocked me, and being new in the community I did not speak up, but should have. About 2 years later a new group of house officers began their 1st yr. rotation. An MD who will go nameless, when faced with being forced to perform abortions, told the OBG faculty absolutely not. Further he stated that if dismissed from the program he would bring suit against them and the school. The OBG department buckled. and he was excused from the performance of abortions. When other house officers saw this, several likewise told the faculty that they were no longer going to perform abortions. The actions of this young physician, while not stopping the performance of abor

tions at this medical school at least brought to end the coercion of house officers to perform them. A 2nd result was the complaint by the remaining OBG residents of having to do all the abortions, so the pro-choice faculty had to get involved to reduce the work load and get their hands involved in that dirty business. Many years later it was while discussing pro-Life issues with another resident that I learned of AAPLOG and joined.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Male

In my residency, I was required to provide post-care and complication care to women undergoing mid-trimester saline abortions, of which there were very many.

Every night on call during my first two years I was called to assist at least 2 or 3 of these ladies that had made such a terrible choice.

It was quite depressing.

However, my refusal to learn technique or to perform the procedures was respected by all of my superiors, and there was no retaliation.

In my opinion, the students must abide by their principles, which, as a ProLife Practitioner-to-be should be to not provide or assist in abortion procedures, and, if Catholic, to not do the same with contraceptive or most infertility procedures. Observation of a procedure that they are powerless to directly prevent (other than prayer) is another matter.

It is important that the preceptor be provided feedback that some of their students do object, and why there are objections. It should be obligatory. That would be an opportunity to minister to that preceptor, and, if they are merely ignorant and not truly evil, they might potentially be open to a change of heart.

Failing this, that care should be observed. If the student has the proper conviction, seeing these things will strengthen that conviction. Having direct observatory experience will allow them to speak with greater knowledge, confidence, authority and conviction against these practices.

That was great advice , especially the part about being prepared with facts. My advice for medical students: PRAY PRAY PRAY. Also remember that we are put in the body of Christ for a reason. Lean on others. Make sure your church is praying for you. Join the Christian Medical and Dental Association, or the Catholic Medical Association, and find a prolife attending who knows the area and what is available. None of us can win this battle alone.

Male

As a medical student who just finished an OB rotation, here’s a few points from my perspective:

1) I felt led to attend a clinic session at PP. It originally wasn’t on my schedule and I had to ask for it to be added, but I wanted to know exactly what goes on there. As tough of an experience as it was to be there, I did it and I’m glad I now know first hand how PP operates. The staff was quite hospitable and was more than willing to let medical students observe counselling sessions, ultrasounds, “procedures”, etc.

2) PP offers many services, including prescribing birth control and a number of GYN procedures unrelated to abortion (i.e. PAPs, colpo, etc.) The student addressed in the email you sent could ask to see that portion of services — it’s much less objectionable. If his/her program director insists she be trained in / exposed to D&Cs or D&Es, there’s another option. With the GYN surg team at my hospital, I participated in a number of D&Cs for other indications — removal of a fetus after IUFD, for collection of tissue for evaluation of post-menopausal bleeding, to go after an IUD with a broken string. As sad as it was to watch the vacuum aspiration of an 18 w fetus that had passed away before the patient presented, the same life issues are not there. Perhaps participating in procedures like this could be an acceptable compromise. (even so, I made sure to find out the exact indication for the D&C before entering the OR).

3) I’d echo the sentiment for knowing the facts, for knowing your patients forwards and backwards, and maintaining a respectful demeanor at all times. With that, there is no justification for the repercussions against the student.

4) Remember that currently there is no legal requirement for the student to participate in procedures contrary to their conscience.

I pray this may be of some help to other students out there facing these issues head-on.

My advice is have the student call 1-800-TELL-ADF

(AAPLOG NOTE: This advice comes from Alliance Defense Fund, who will be glad to advise you and even defend you legally, if necessary.)

This is the 4th letter we are sending with a collection of unedited comments from your peers in answer to the question: “What do I do if my assignment includes time spent on an abortion service or Planned Parenthood clinic, or similar assignment?”

AAPLOG points out that you do have conscience rights–(they come from God)– and you have conscience protection, which comes from U.S. law: The Church Amendment from the 1970’s and the Hoekstra-Coats Medical Training Nondiscrimination Act of 1995 (which declares that an entity that forced individuals or programs to participate in abortions would be discriminatory, and on that basis that entity would lose federal funding.) You have conscience rights. (And if push comes to shove, the Alliance Defense Fund and other similar legal organizations would be glad to take your case.)

For practical advice, we feel much wisdom resides with those who have faced the situation. Thus, we have collected their advice in these 4 letters.

NOTE: All 4 letters together can be found on our website home page under Attention ObGyn Residents, and Attention Medical Students. (This material will be put up this coming week.)

Advice from your peers:

I would contact the dean of the medical school and request a meeting to voice my objection.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

I was a resident in a top 10 OB/GYN residency program. As an intern, I was asked to hold the U/S for one first trimester abortion and after that told them that I would not attend or perform abortions or go to abortion lectures. The harassment was brutal. I was discriminated against in assignments to surgical cases, in a deliberate attempt to restrict my surgical experience and ostracized by my fellow residents. Attendings gave me the cold shoulder. I was threatened by the chair but told him that he could fire me, but that I would not perform abortions or stop praying with patients.

The advice about being stronger academically is very good. I got extra surgical experience by moonlighting. An attending at a Catholic hospital took me under his wing as well. Ironically, in my chief year, four junior residents stood up to the department and said that they also would not perform abortions. All power is in Jesus’ hands, and He will not abandon you. I ALWAYS found that it was better to be bold and stand for truth rather than being silent and/or hiding, (it would be nice to say that I always did the right thing, but I didn’t.). God honors holy boldness but only forgives cowardice (Prov. 25:26, Matt. 5:13). He won’t honor obnoxious behavior that disgraces His name. Another key is to have a group of people praying for you. In that hospital, people in Radiology, Environmental Services, the OR and elsewhere were praying and supporting me. In the end, the fire I went through made me a stronger Christian.

Remember that God is on your side, and if you have to suffer for Him, it is well. Also remember that few chairs will openly try to fire you or damage your career, since they are afraid of legal challenges (important to remember, and to tell them if need be).

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

I am a medical student from a prestigious med school and I just finished my ob/gyn rotation as a med student. I did end up talking to the course director prior to the rotation, but before I met with him, I talked with other medical students who I knew had the rotation and had gone before me. I would recommend talking with students at your school who share your opinion and have had the rotation (your local CMDA or Catholic group would know those students) and what they did. I would recommend talking with the course director if others have said he or she is reasonable. But, when you talk to him/her don’t site faith or other reasons other than specific legal language of it is “against your conscience rights.” That is still the law (even if it’s not reinforced) and most schools don’t want to get entangled in a legal battle with students. Usually they will work with you. Asking for an alternative usually works as well because they want you to learn and be productive.

Another thing you can do is talk to other students about whether or not such experience is truly required in terms of a sign-in sheet. In my experience, even though a go to a great university, most extras don’t have a sign in sheet and they don’t know who is supposed to show up when or if anyone is coming. Often times I find myself arriving at rotations or extras and they didn’t know I was suppose to come and didn’t have any plans for me being there. So, for example my school had a “required” lecture on abortion, but there was no sign in sheet, so I just didn’t show and it didn’t make a difference, no one knew and no one cared. I just read the required chapter for the exam and was fine. In my opinion, you are spending a quarter of a million on your education and you are the consumer, so you should make the education the best for you. But, if you do go, I agree, work hard, know your facts, and be better (more cordial, better fund of knowledge, know the evidence based medicine, etc) than your med student peers. But, I would recommend requesting at the pp site to not observe the actual abortion procedure – your conscience and soul is more important than anything on this earth

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As a former abortion provider, now pro-lifer whose ministry has operated a charity full pre-natal clinic, I would add Federally Qualified Health Clinics. FQHC’s are normally conservative and in great need of physicians. Family Planning is standard care in most FQHC’s.

Some charity clinics offer family planning as well as pre-natal care. Check your area for non-profit clinics that may even offer a broader range of OB-GYN care than Planned Parenthood.

Please join me in praying that the Lord will open a door for these young physicians for life-affirming service in their rotation.

Carol Everet

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am a health care provider and have recently resigned from Planned Parenthood due to religious conflict. I suggest that if the student is forced to rotate there, he or she, can ask the preceptor to not work on the surgical or med ab services, instead work on the gyn, male services, or, if available at that branch, the prenatal service.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Female

Wow. Thankfully I did not have such an issue at Vanderbilt. My heart goes out to those students. I think a lot of it depends on how receptive their faculty is. If this is a regular event that they have students in the rotation complete, they might consider forming a petition to show that they are not alone in their pro-life stance. If the Planned Parenthood experience is a lecture/ clinic environment (in other words, no exposure to actual procedures), they could attend regardless, as this would be a good learning opportunity to hear some of the so called “facts” and “counseling” that patients receive there.

I just hope that even if they feel they feel they cannot speak out for fear of grades/ evaluations, that they realize that there are many pro-life individuals in medicine! They are not alone!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Male

Have him and his colleague hold the line and do an alternative. If the school refuses, then they will need to seek legal counsel. They must not be intimidated at this stage. They tried this with me and I held fast. They cannot require you, under the federal statutes (Church amendment, etc) to do anything against your conscience.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jay D. Iams, MD; Vincenzo Berghells, MD. Care for women with prior preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. August 2010;203(3):89-100

This is an extremely informative article on preterm birth, an issue that complicates I in 8 pregnancies in the U.S.A. Because of associated morbidity and expense, preterm birth is of intense interest to the medical community. The major author is Jay D. Iams, MD, MFM, Professor and Vice Chair of OSU Dept of ObGyn.
We certainly commend this article to your study.

An Iam’s observation of particular interest to both doctors and their patients is the following:

“Contrary to common belief, population-based
studies,[34-36] have found that elective pregnancy
terminations in the first and second trimesters are
associated with a very small but apparently real
increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous
preterm birth (PTB).[37]”

We applaud his statement. Most high profile American writers won’t breathe such a thing. Allow us to mention 3 points in regard to his observations:

1. “contrary to common belief…..’ There are currently 114 studies in the literature all showing a statistically significant association between induced abortion and subsequent preterm birth. And just about none to the contrary. Why then would this association be “contrary to common belief??” Because the association is systematically ignored or severely downplayed by the established authorities in our country. It is not mentioned under complications of induced abortion in any ACOG literature we know of. It is not generally taught. It is denied by default. Maybe that is why it is “contrary to common belief……” Obviously 114 articles should carry some weight, even to the willfully blind.

2. “…terminations….are associated with a very small but apparently real increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth (PTB).” Here he references the 2009 BJOG Shaw article, which found a 1.36 RR (36% increase) for PTB with a previous induced abortion. He calls this a “very small” increase. Remember the WHI study of 2003 that showed a RR of 1.3 for breast cancer in HRT users. 1.3 RR was NOT considered “very small”—in fact, it turned the HRT world upside down, so significant was it deemed to be! But here 1.36 RR Is called “very small” — We find that strange.

Additionally, 50% of women have more than one abortion, and the literature finds the PTB risk ratio for them goes to 1.6 to 1.9., that is a 60% to 90% increase in PTB is subsequent pregnancies for half the women involved.

3. Finally, in the abstract, Dr. Iams notes: . “African American women have rates of recurrent preterm birth that are nearly twice that of women of other backgrounds.” He hazards no guess as to why. African-American women have an induced abortion rate 3X that of other American women. Might THAT factor into their 2X increased rate of PTB?? Or into their 3X increased rate of “very” preterm birth (a fact established by the IOM Report)? And it is of note that the IOM Report noting 3X increased rate remained after adjustment for socio-economic status, and cigarette and alcholol use. Yet the medical establishment refuses to consider that abortion might be the “unknown” variable.

Prematurity carries certain severe risks. Preemies under 32 weeks have a Cerebral Palsy rates 55 times higher that the rates for a term baby. Ignoring the vast literature evidence of the association of induced abortion and subsequent preterm birth is certainly not in the best interest of women considering having an induced abortion, or of their children to be yet born.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Files Suit Against Pro-Lifer

Liberty Counsel has agreed to represent Mary Susan Pine, a sidewalk abortion counselor, who is being sued by the politically motivated U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. Using the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) federal law and seeking the maximum fine of $10,000, Holder alleges that Pine “obstructed” a car entering a Florida abortion clinic nearly a year ago, on November 19, 2009. The suit is entitled Holder v. Pine.

The suit alleges only one act on November 19, 2009, in which Holder claims Pine obstructed a car by stepping in front of the vehicle when it entered the clinic. Pine never obstructs anyone and denies she ever obstructed any vehicle. Notwithstanding, Holder’s suit alleges Pine is a threat and must be fined the maximum of $10,000. Holder’s complaint is only 31⁄2 pages. Since the passage of FACE in 1994, this case is the first time anyone has been sued in Florida under the law.

AAPLOG comment: Come to your own conclusions. We will report on this case as it develops.

(Read this Liberty Alert online at www.LC.org)

August 24, 2010

Dear ProLife Colleague,

The following is a news release from Liberty Counsel:

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Files Suit Against Pro-Lifer

Liberty Counsel has agreed to represent Mary Susan Pine, a sidewalk abortion counselor, who is being sued by the politically motivated U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. Using the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) federal law and seeking the maximum fine of $10,000, Holder alleges that Pine “obstructed” a car entering a Florida abortion clinic nearly a year ago, on November 19, 2009. The suit is entitled Holder v. Pine.

The suit alleges only one act on November 19, 2009, in which Holder claims Pine obstructed a car by stepping in front of the vehicle when it entered the clinic. Pine never obstructs anyone and denies she ever obstructed any vehicle. Notwithstanding, Holder’s suit alleges Pine is a threat and must be fined the maximum of $10,000. Holder’s complaint is only 31⁄2 pages. Since the passage of FACE in 1994, this case is the first time anyone has been sued in Florida under the law.

AAPLOG comment: Come to your own conclusions. We will report on this case as it develops.

This is an extremely informative article on preterm birth, an issue that complicates I in 8 pregnancies in the U.S.A. Because of associated morbidity and expense, preterm birth is of intense interest to the medical community. The major author is Jay D. Iams, MD, MFM, Professor and Vice Chair of OSU Dept of ObGyn.

We certainly commend this article to your study.

An Iam’s observation of particular interest to both doctors and their patients is the following:

“Contrary to common belief, population-based studies,[34-36] have found that elective pregnancy terminations in the first and second trimesters are associated with a very small but apparently real increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth (PTB).[37]”

We applaud his statement. Most high profile American writers won’t breathe such a thing. Allow us to mention 3 points in regard to his observations:

1. “contrary to common belief…..’ There are currently 114 studies in the literature all showing a statistically significant association between induced abortion and subsequent preterm birth. And just about none to the contrary. Why then would this association be “contrary to common belief??” Because the association is systematically ignored or severely downplayed by the established authorities in our country. It is not mentioned under complications of induced abortion in any ACOG literature we know of. It is not generally taught. It is denied by default. Maybe that is why it is “contrary to common belief……” Obviously 114 articles should carry some weight, even to the willfully blind.

2. “…terminations….are associated with a very small but apparently real increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth (PTB).” Here he references the 2009 BJOG Shaw article, which found a 1.36 RR (36% increase) for PTB with a previous induced abortion. He calls this a “very small” increase. Remember the WHI study of 2003 that showed a RR of 1.3 for breast cancer in HRT users. 1.3 RR was NOT considered “very small”—in fact, it turned the HRT world upside down, so significant was it deemed to be! But here 1.36 RR Is called “very small” — We find that strange.

Additionally, 50% of women have more than one abortion, and the literature finds the PTB risk ratio for them goes to 1.6 to 1.9., that is a 60% to 90% increase in PTB is subsequent pregnancies for half the women involved.

3. Finally, in the abstract, Dr. Iams notes: . “African American women have rates of recurrent preterm birth that are nearly twice that of women of other backgrounds.” He hazards no guess as to why. African-American women have an induced abortion rate 3X that of other American women. Might THAT factor into their 2X increased rate of PTB?? Or into their 3X increased rate of “very” preterm birth (a fact established by the IOM Report)? And it is of note that the IOM Report noting 3X increased rate remained after adjustment for socio-economic status, and cigarette and alcholol use. Yet the medical establishment refuses to consider that abortion might be the “unknown” variable.

Prematurity carries certain severe risks. Preemies under 32 weeks have a Cerebral Palsy rates 55 times higher that the rates for a term baby. Ignoring the vast literature evidence of the association of induced abortion and subsequent preterm birth is certainly not in the best interest of women considering having an induced abortion, or of their children yet to be born.

Natick, MA – Up to $600,000 will be awarded to individuals or organizations that have worked to save human lives and will be honored for their life saving principles and practices at an invitation-only ceremony in January hosted by the Gerard Health Foundation as part of their second Life Prizes program.

The inaugural awards and ceremony in 2009 were unprecedented in size and magnificence. More than 1,200 VIPs, students and pro-life activists gathered to honor the winners. Celebrity participation included Master of Ceremonies Laura Ingraham and popular Christian rock band BarlowGirl.

Again in Nobel Prize-like fashion, the 2009 – 2010 “Norinne A. and Raymond E. Ruddy Memorial Life Prizes” awards will formally recognize winners at a spectacular ceremony and reception to be held in Washington DC on January 22, 2011.

The 2009 – 2010 winners will be selected based upon their success in saving human lives through efforts including public advocacy, scientific research, outreach programs, public disclosure activities, legal action, and other worthy achievements as determined by a qualified selection committee that shares the values and principles of the Foundation.

Watch last year’s event video and read the ceremony speeches at www.LifePrizes.org.

“Our Foundation has a profoundly simple mission: to save lives,” stated philanthropist Raymond B. Ruddy, founder of the Gerard Health Foundation. “Life Prizes works to honor those who have best accomplished this noble goal and to inspire the next generation to break the mold in their life-saving work. As last year’s winners will tell you, ordinary people can achieve extraordinary goals. We look forward to celebrating six new heroes and thanking them for their ingenuity, dedication, sacrifices and leadership.”

Nomination packages have been sent to more than 100 leaders of pro-life organizations and are due back in mid-August. The selection committee will announce Life Prizes winners in October, and awards will be given at a ceremony in Washington, DC in January of 2009.

Previous Life Prizes Winners

• Jill Stanek – Nurse who first publicly exposed infanticide of abortion survivors
• Lila Rose – Student leader who has launched several successful, undercover investigations exposing statutory rape cover-up and racism at Planned Parenthood
• American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) – A professional voice reaffirming the unique value and dignity of individual human life in all stages of growth and development from conception onward.
• Richard Doerflinger – Associate Director of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, bioethics expert, and consummate researcher
• Kay Coles James – Founder of The Gloucester Institute and of Black Americans for Life, pro-life advocate in the highest levels of government for decades
• Margaret “Peggy” Hartshorn – President, Heartbeat International, a preeminent network of more than 1,000 pregnancy resource centers

How Life Prizes Will Be Awarded

Nomination Process

Life Prizes accepted nominations from a pre-selected group of more than 100 nominators who support the same values and principles represented by the Gerard Health Foundation and were encouraged to nominate at least one worthy candidate by August 16, 2010. Nominees will be evaluated by their advances in public advocacy, scientific research, outreach and public disclosure activities, legal action or other noteworthy achievements.

Selection Committee

After the nomination deadline, the Gerard Health Foundation will carefully review all submissions and select a group of approximately 20 finalists, which will then be evaluated by a prestigious selection committee of 7 to 10 eminently qualified individuals who will select up to six award recipients.

Awards and Ceremony

Awards totaling up to $600,000 will be presented to winners of the Life Prizes at an awards ceremony held in conjunction with Students for Life of America’s annual conference during the week of the March for Life in Washington, DC. Recipients have the option to designate their prize money to a charity that is consistent with the Gerard Health Foundation’s objectives and funding policies.

About Life Prizes

The Gerard Health Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to saving lives through the funding and financing of life saving initiatives throughout the world, including extensive support of HIV/AIDS prevention and ranging from activities such as abstinence education, support of pregnancy resource centers, funding clean water programs, distributing food and medical supplies to hospitals in Africa as well as general support for children’s hospitals in Africa. Life Prizes has been championed by a number of devoted pro-life leaders from various branches of the movement.

To interview Raymond Ruddy or Claude Allen of Life Prizes, please contact Mary Beth Hutching (ext. 105) or Colleen O’Boyle (ext. 122) at (703) 683-5004.

The August issue of AJOG has an extremely informative article on preterm birth, an issue that complicates I in 8 pregnancies in the U.S.A.  Because of associated morbidity and expense, preterm birth is of intense interest to the medical community.  The major author is Jay D. Iams,  MD, MFM, Professor and Vice Chair of OSU Dept of ObGyn.  (Jay D. Iams, MD; Vincenzo Berghells, MD.  Care for women with prior preterm birth.  American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.  August 2010;203(3):89-100)

We certainly commend this article to your study.

An Iam’s observation of particular interest is the following:

“Contrary to common belief, population-based

studies,[34-36] have found that elective pregnancy

terminations in the first and second trimesters are

associated with a very small but apparently real

increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous

preterm birth (PTB).[37]”

We applaud his statement.  Most high profile American writers won’t breathe such a thing.  Allow us to mention 2 points in regard to his observation.

1.  “contrary to common belief…..’ There are currently 114 studies in the literature all showing a statistically significant association between induced abortion and subsequent preterm birth.  And just about none to the contrary.  Why then would this association be “contrary to common belief??”  Because the association is systematically ignored or severely downplayed by the established authorities in our country.  It is not mentioned under complications of induced abortion in any ACOG literature we know of.  It is not generally taught.  It is denied by default.  Maybe that is why it is “contrary to common belief……”  Obviously 114 articles should carry some weight, even to the willfully blind.

2.  “…terminations….are associated with a very small but apparently real  increase in the risk of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth (PTB).”  Here he references the 2009 BJOG Shaw article, which found a 1.36 RR (36% increase) for PTB with a previous induced abortion.  He calls this a “very small” increase.  Remember the WHI study of 2003 that showed a RR of 1.3 for breast cancer in HRT users.   1.3 RR was NOT considered “very small”—in fact, it turned the HRT world upside down, so significant was it deemed to be!  But here 1.36 RR Is called “very small” —maybe because induced abortion is the associated culprit?    (“See no evil” in induced abortion)

Additionally, 50% of women have more than one abortion, and the literature finds the PTB risk ratio for them goes to 1.6 to 1.9., that is a 60% to 90% increase in PTB is subsequent pregnancies

Finally, in the abstract,  Dr. Iams notes: . “African American women have rates of recurrent preterm birth that are nearly twice that of women of other backgrounds.”  He hazards no guess as to why.  Africian-American women have an induced abortion rate 3 times that of other American women.  Might THAT factor in to the 2X increased rate of PTB??  Perish the thought!!   Rather than consider the abortion association, some have even suggested it may be a racial genetic failing in the cervical tissues of African-Americans!    (“see no evil”)

Prematurity carries certain severe risks.  Preemies under 32 weeks  have a Cerebral Palsy rates 55 times higher that the rates for a term baby.   Ignoring the 114 studies mentioned above (the “blind eye” approach) may not be in the best interest of women considering an induced abortion, or of their subsequent children—would you say??

Jdc/aaplog

PS:  for a summary of the last 15 years literature on induced abortion and subsequent PTB, go to http://www.aaplog.org/complications-of-induced-abortion/induced-abortion-and-pre-term-birth/

This would be a great project for Resident education.  Simply have them evaluate the literature.  (It seems better than the “see no evil’ approach.)  They may even be able to find an article or two that contradicts the finding of the 114 articles mentioned!